Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NASRULLAH KHAN versus THE STATE


Section 249A & 561 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Termination of Criminal Procedure For the specific performance of the contract, the sale of a land civil suit, pending in court, other applications that show misuse of the law. There are hearings, not happenings. Judgment in such proceedings as may be taken before the trial magistrate under 5 249

1986 P Cr. L J 2856

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Zafarullah, J

NASRULLAH KHAN Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 790/Q of 1978, decided on 23rd April, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

‑‑‑Ss. 249‑A & 561‑A‑‑Quashing of criminal proceedings‑‑Agreement of sale of land‑‑Civil suit for specific performance of agreement, pending in Court‑‑Other pleas showing abuse of process of law, raised‑ Contentions, held, were not be adjudicated in such proceedings as those could be raised before trial Magistrate under 5.249‑A‑‑Petition dismissed.

Ch. Muhammad Yaqoob Sidhu for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

Mushtaq Raj for the Complainant.

JUDGMENT

A criminal case pending against the petitioner in a criminal Court at Wazirabad which was registered against him at the instance of Fateh Muhammad complainant, is sought to be quashed through this criminal miscellaneous. An agreement, dated 22‑1‑1975 for sale of land, said to have been executed by the complainant, in favour of the petitioner, is the subject‑matter of the criminal case.

2. It is contended that before registration of the criminal case, the petitioner brought a civil suit for specific performance of the agreement aforesaid and till its decision the criminal Court should not have proceeded with the hearing of the criminal matter. Some other pleas have also been urged to show that the registration of the case itself was an abuse of the process of law.

3. These contentions need not be adjudicated upon in these proceedings for these can well be raised by the petitioner before the learned trial Magistrate in pursuance of the provision of section 249‑A. Cr.P.C. If such an application is made, it shall be decided before embarking upon the hearing on merits.

With these observations, the criminal miscellaneous is disposed of.

S.A. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Issa Khel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.