Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD BAKHSH ALIAS MAMDA versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 363 Bail, FIR grant after 7 months incident, case against the complainant for dissolution of marriage by alleged abductor Listed, no witnesses to the incident are available in the suspect's guaranteed circumstances

1986 P Cr. L J 2362

[Lahore]

Before Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J

MUHAMMAD BAKHSH alias MAMDA Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 470/B of 1985, decided on 29th May, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 363‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑F.I.R. lodged after 7 months of occurrence‑‑Suit for dissolution of marriage by alleged abductee against complainant instituted‑‑No eye‑witness of occurrence available‑‑Accused allowed bail in circumstances.

Ijaz Muhammad Bhatti for Petitioner.

Abdur Rashid Sheikh for State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail by Muhammad Bakhsh. The ease was registered on 24‑6‑1984 regarding an occurrence which took place seven months earlier to that. It is alleged by Manzoor Hussain complainant that his wife Mst. Gullan was enticed by Muhammad Bakhsh who left her minor children in the house of complainant and took away cash and ornaments while accompanying Muhammad Bakhsh petitioner. It is stated by Manzoor Ahmad, A.S.I. that Mst. Gullan was recovered after registration of the case. In her statement under section 164, Cr.P.C., she could not support the prosecution. She later on came back to the house of her husband Manzoor Hussain and after living with him for some time again started living with Muhammad Bakhsh accused. It was at this stage that both Gullan and Muhammad Bakhsh were arrested and are in judicial lock‑up. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Mst. Gullan was initially recovered from the house of her parents. She filed a suit for dissolution of her marriage against Manzoor Hussain which is still pending and that the present case has been lodged with mala fides after a delay of seven months. The learned counsel for the State has controverted these contentions.

2. I have gone through the record. The F.I.R. was lodged after al delay of seven months. Mst. Gullan has filed a suit for dissolution of marriage which is still pending. There is no eye‑witness of the occurrence. As such the petitioner is allowed bail till the disposal of the case on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.5,000 (Rs. Five thousand only) with one surety, in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C/Duty Magistrate, Multan.

S.A. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
power of attorney advocate Charsada lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.