Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

THE STATE versus MASROOR AHMAD QURESHI


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 417 Appeals Against Retribution By The Offender Charges for withholding trial: Held, held, Nut was acquitted under the meaning of Section 245/265 H / 248 and PC's appeal against the brakes, so lying [complaint]

1986 P Cr. L J 2320

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

THE STATE‑‑Appellant

Versus

MASROOR AHMAD QURESHI and others‑‑Respondents

Criminal Appeal No. 654 of 1984, decided on 3rd February, 1986.

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1998)‑‑--

‑‑‑S. 417‑‑Appeal against acquittal‑‑Maintainability ‑of‑‑Complaint not filed by competent person‑‑Trial Court dropping proceedings‑‑Accuse:, held, was nut acquitted within meanings of Ss. 245/265‑H/248 & 249‑Cr.P.C.‑‑Appeal against acquittal would not, therefore. lie ‑[Complaint].

(b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑--

‑‑‑S. 245/248/249‑A/265‑H‑‑Acquittal‑‑Dropping of proceedings on incompetently filed complaint would not amount to acquittal. [Acquittal]

S.M. Zubair. A .A.‑G. (Punjab) for the State.

Muhammad Saleem Sheikh, Mazhar Hussain and Muhammad Rafiq Shad for Respondent No. 1.

Nemo for the Remaining Respondents.

Date of hearing: 3rd February, 1986.

ORDER

This Criminal Appeal against acquittal filed by the State, arises from the judgment of the learned Special Judge, Anti‑Corruption, Lahore whereby he on 24‑5‑1984, while dropping proceedings against the respondents under section 420/468/471/201/109, P.P.C. read with section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1947 discharged them of bail bonds.

2. Since after hearing the learned counsel for the parties 1 feel inclined to dismiss the appeal on the ground of non‑maintainability, so I need not set out the facts in detail and enter into the merits of the case. I find that the learned Special Judge Anti‑Corruption has passed the following order:‑-

"As a result of the above, I hold that this Court has no jurisdiction to proceed with this case as the complaint was not filed by the person competent under section 29 of the Act XV111 of 1958. The proceedings in hand are accordingly dropped Muhammad Saleem, Ghulam Mustafa, Suhail Ahmed, Abdul Haq.

Manzoor Ahmad, Sh. Muhammad Abdullah, Muhammad Ayyub Gohar and Muhammad Ilyas accused are on bail. The bail bonds 'are discharged."

From the order reproduced above, it is very much obvious that the accused persons have not been acquitted within the meaning of sections 245/265‑H, 248 and 249‑A, Cr.P.C. and proceedings have simply been dropped against them. In this view of the matter, I am convinced that appeal against acquittal does not lie and the same is, therefore dismissed.

S.A. Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law websites from Tobatek Singh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.