Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMADA versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Bail, approval of 14 days delay in registration report is not satisfactorily guaranteed, under the circumstances.

1986 P C r. L J 1103

[Lahore]

Before Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, J

MUHAMMADA‑‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3009‑B of 1985, decided on 15th January, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Delay of 14 days in lodging report not explained satisfactorily‑‑Bail allowed, in circumstances.

Ch. Ghulam Sarwar for the Petitioner.

Farooq Bedar, Asstt. A.‑G. for the State.

ORDER

Muhammada son of Hussain alias Husaina, caste Mayo, resident of Kot Dara, Police Station Kanganpur, Tehsil and District Kasur has applied for bail after arrest. He is an accused in a murder case. The incident in which he is involved is alleged to have taken place on 14‑6‑1985 at 9‑00/10‑00 a.m. He applied for bail but his request was turned down by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kasur by Order, dated 21‑11‑1985.

Learned counsel appearing in support of this petition raised number of contentions. The strongest on which great stress was laid by the counsel was chat according to the F.I.R., the occurrence took place on 14‑6‑1985 while the report was lodged 14 days after the alleged occurrence. Even the medico‑legal report was not obtained. According to the learned counsel, this showed that the prosecution story was not reliable. The actual incident was otherwise. The prosecution was withholding the same.

At this stage I am not inclined to comment upon the prosecution case, but the fact remains that there is delay of 14 days in lodging the report, which has not been satisfactorily explained by the Asstt. Advocate‑General. I am, therefore, inclined to admit the petitioner to bail. He shall be released provided he furnishes bail bond in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Fifty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

S.G.D. Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Mehrab Pur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.