Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SYED MUHAMMAD IKRAM ALIAS MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus THE STATE


Revising the penalties against the evidence of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 411 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 439, shows that the stolen property was presented and identified by a prosecution witness at the time of the prosecution. ? At the second trial, it is alleged that he was already detained in the relevant case in another case, therefore, this offense could not have been committed in the date of his presence, and it was alleged that Is also powered by power. Such membranes were not taken against the accused in the case to show any document on record that he was in custody at the relevant time. The prosecution's case against the accused proved beyond doubt. Sentenced

1986 P Cr. L J 1062

[Lahore]

Before Saad Saood Jan, J

Syed MUHAMMAD IKRAM alias MUHAMMAD AKRAM‑‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 15‑B/C of 1984, decided on 4th July, 1984

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

----S. 497‑‑Customs Act (1V of 1969). 5.163‑‑Articles intended to be used for preparation of forged documents having been recovered by customs raiding party from a house‑‑House from where recovery was made, not being in exclusive occupation of accused‑‑Accused admitted to bail in circumstances of case.

M. Salim Sehgal for Petitioner.

Maqbool Ahmad II for the State.

ORDER

The allegations against the petitioner are that on 23‑5‑1984 a raiding party organized by the Customs Department recovered 125 blank forms 'A' blank passports, two rubber stamps, stencils and stencil- holders. These forms and articles were intended to prepare forged documents for the illegal import of goods into Pakistan. It appears from the F.I.R. that the house from where the recovery was made was rot exclusively in the occupation of the petitioner. Let the petitioner be admitted to bail on his executing a bond in the sum of Rs.25,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Special Judge (Customs), Lahore.

S.A. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Kamra lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.