Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

RAHEEL SAJID versus THE STATE


Illegal Pakistan Penal Code Section 342A 364 Approved Appeal Not Complied With Criminal Appeal Statement In Writing Criminal Statements Under Section 342A 364

1986 P Cr. L J 1006

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Man, J

RAHEEL SAJID Appellant

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 230 of 1981, decided on 12th November, 1984.

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

‑‑‑S. 420/468‑‑Illegality in recording of statement of accused under Ss. 342 a 364, Cr.P.C.‑‑Trial Court after recording statement under S.342, Cr.P.C. not giving certificate that examination of accused was taken in its presence‑‑Record containing full and true account of statement of accused‑‑Mandatory provision not complied with‑‑Appeal accepted.

R.A. Awan for Appellant.

Ch. M. Mansha for the State.

Date of hearing: 12th November, 1984.

JUDGMENT

This criminal appeal arises from the judgment of learned Special Judge (Central), Anti‑Corruption, Lahore whereby he on 22‑4‑1981 convicted Raheel Sajid appellant under section 420/468, P.P.C. and sentenced him to two years' R.I. and a fine of Rs. 6,000 in default thereof to further R.I. for 4 months.

2. The learned counsel has argued the case on merits. Since after hearing the learned counsel I feel inclined to set aside the conviction and send back the case to the trial Court because of illegality in recording of the statement of the accused under section 342/364, Cr.P.C. I need not enter into the merits of the case. I find that the trial Court after having recorded the statement of the accused under section 342, Cr.P.C. on 1‑4‑1981 did not care to give certificate to the effect that examination of the accused was taken in its presence and hearing and that the record contained full and true account of the statement made by the accused. This, to my mind, is not 'a mere irregularity but clear illegality because the mandatory requirement has not be some With That being the position, there is no option but to set aside to conviction and sentence of the appellant and send back the case to the trial Court for retrial from the stage of recording of the statement of the accused. The trial Court shall record the statement of the accuse person again and give requisite certificate thereon and then decided the case according to law.

M . A . K. Appeal accepted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Shahdad Kot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.