Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 304A Guarantee, FIR Applicant is responsible for causing death by driving with a beating and negligence. , Which can be punished under Section 304A, PPC offense is guaranteed. , Applicants' advance bail prematurely, guaranteed

1986 P Cr. L J 984

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MUHAMMAD ASLAM Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 806‑B/BWP of 1983, decided on 5th September. 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

---‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 304‑A‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑As per F .I. R. petitioner liable for causing death due to rash and negligent driving, as punishable under S. 304‑A, P.P.C.‑‑Offence being bailable, petitioner's pre‑arrest bail confirmed, in circumstance.

Malik Yar Muhammad for Petitioner.

Ahmad Mansoor for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Muhammad Aslam petitioner in a case under sections 304/337, 338 and 347, P.P.C. registered at P.S. Chishtian, vide F.I.R. No. 170/83, dated 8‑7‑1983.

2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner while driving truck rashly and negligently caused the death of Barkat Ali and injuries to Bashir Ahmad.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations levelled in the F.I.R. accepted at its face value no non‑bailable offence appears to have been committed by the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the State has half‑heartedly opposed this application.

4. After hearing the learned counsel and going through the record I find that in the F.I.R. it has been stated that:

This act is thus punishable under section 304‑A, P.P.C. which is bailable. It is really unfortunate that the learned Additional Sessions Judge has refused bail to the petitioner in a bailable offence.

5. For what has been stated above, the interim pre‑arrest bail already allowed to the petitioner is, hereby, confirmed.

S. G. D. Bail confirmed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from FR Kohat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.