Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD YASIN versus THE STATE


In its statement filed under Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 11 bail, abduction grant 164, the CCP alleges that They do not violate the charges of adultery appear as 18 years old

1986 P Cr. L J 883

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MUHAMMAD YASIN and another‑‑Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 307113 of 1985/BWP, decided on 17th March, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑--

‑‑‑S.497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 11‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Abductee in her statement recorded under 164, Cr. P.C. not levelling allegations of Zina against accused persons‑‑Age of abductee shown as 18 years‑‑Question of abduction in order to subject abductee to sexual intercourse, held, required further inquiry‑‑Bail granted.

Malik Farrukh Mahmood for Petitioners.

Muhammad Fahim Riaz for the State,

JUDGMENT

This is an application by Muhammad Yasin and Muhammad Shafi petitioners for bail in case under section 11 of the Offence of Zina, (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 registered at Police Station Dera Nawab Sahib vide F.I.R. No.23/85.

2. The prosecution case is that the petitioners abducted Mst. Tahira Parveen in order to subject her to sexual intercourse.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are no allegations of Zina against the petitioners. Conversely, the learned counsel for the State has opposed the plea for the bail of the petitioners on the ground that there is sufficient evidence to connect the petitioners with the abduction of Mst. Tahira Parveen, a minor girl aged 13 years.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties with care. I find that in her statement recorded under, section 164, Cr.P.C., Mat. Tahira Parveen has not levelled allegations of Zina by the petitioners with her; that she has been married to one Muhammad Hanif on 2‑3‑1985 and her age has been shown as 18 years and that the question of abduction in order to subject her to sexual intercourse requires further inquiry.

5. For what has been stated above, the petitioners are allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C/Duty Magistrate, Bahawalpur.

H.A.K. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Jhand lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.