Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUR RAHIM ALIAS RAHIM BAKHSH versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Bail, Each of the accused's grants allegedly receive money for a trip to Saudi Arabia from three witnesses Finally, the fake witnesses were deported from Jeddah to Pakistan. Denying the allegations against, the affidavit stated. Things are allowed in judicial lockup for about seven months and no longer required for investigation

1986 P Cr. L J 787(2)

[Lahore]

Before Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J

ABDUR RAHIM alias RAHIM BAKHSH‑‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 482/B of 1985, decided on 1st June, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) -

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused allegedly received money each from three witnesses for their visit to Saudi Arabia‑‑Visa entries ultimately found to have been forged‑‑Witnesses deported to Pakistan from Jeddah‑‑Two witnesses gave affidavits rebutting allegations against accused‑‑Accused in judicial lock‑up since about seven months and no longer required for investigation‑‑Bail granted in circumstances.

Sultan Alam for Petitioner.

Sh. Nazir Alam for the State.

ORDER

This is a petition for bail on behalf of Abdur Rahim. It is alleged that he received Rs.8,000 per head from Bahadur Khan, Ghulam Hussain and Habib Ullah to facilitate their visit to Saudi Arabia on some job but when they reached Jeddah Airport, it transpired that the visa entries were forged. All the three persons accordingly came back to Pakistan in 1979. On 21‑1‑1981, the present case was registered by Wahid Bakhsh, Assistant Director, F.I.A. on secret information.

2. It is contended by the learned counsel that Bahadur and Ghulam Hussain have sworn affidavits rebutting the allegations against the petitioner. It is further contended that the petitioner is in judicial lock‑up for the last about seven months and is no longer required for purposes of investigation. The learned State counsel has opposed this petition. In view of the affidavits of Bahadur and Ghulam Hussain and the fact that the person of the petitioner is no longer required for further investigation, the petitioner is allowed bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, D.G. Khan.

S.A. Bail accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firms from Machh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.