Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AMIN versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497 and 498 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), 5 302/34 plaintiffs were declared to be witnesses to injuries from simple, two-pronged weapons, any injury imposed by the accused. Not charged, he was detained. Be released on bail under the circumstances

1986 P Cr. L J 782(2)

[Lahore]

Before Rustam S. Sidhwa, J

MUHAMMAD AMIN and others Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2372/B of 1985, decided on 20th October, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

‑‑‑Ss. 497 & 498‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), 5.302/34‑‑Accused attributed simple, blunt weapon injuries to witness‑‑No injury alleged to have been inflicted to deceased by accused‑‑Accused, held, was entitled to be released on bail, in circumstances.

Ch. Muhammad Hussain Chhachhar for Petitioner.

Imtiaz Ahmad for the State.

Bashir Ahmad for the Complainant.

Date of hearing: 19th October, 1985.

JUDGMENT

This is a petition under section 497/498, Cr.P.C. by Muhammad Amin and Muhammad Jamil, petitioners, for bail in respect of a case instituted against them and two others under section 302/34, P.P.C. at Police Station Renala Khurd on 12‑8‑1985.

2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that Muhammad Amin and Muhammad Jamil, petitioners, and Yasin and Atta Muhammad, Amir co‑accused, disliked Lai Khan P.W. taking his cattle to the water Khal for quenching their thirst. On the day of occurrence, Lai Khan, P.W. who was taking his cattle to the Khal, was reprimanded by the petitioners and the co‑accused. During this occurrence, abusive language was exchanged by both the parties. When Lal Khan P.W. persisted in taking his cattle to the Khal, the two petitioners and the co‑accused came there armed with Sotas. Muhammad Jamil and Muhammad Amin petitioners, inflicted Sots injuries on Lai Khan P.W, Ghulam Hussain deceased, father of Lai Khan, came to the spot to save his son, whereupon Yasin, co‑accused, inflicted Sota blow on his head, which proved fatal, and Atta Muhammad, co‑accused, inflicted a. Sota blow on his right flank.

3. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the complainant and the State and have also perused the police record. The two petitioners are only attributed to have inflicted simple blunt weapon injuries on Lai Khan P.W. They did not inflict any injury on Ghulam Hussain, deceased. In the circumstances, this petition p is accepted and Muhammad Amin and Muhammad Jamil, petitioners, are released on bail, subject to their furnishing security in the sum of Rs.30,000 (Rupees thirty thousand) each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate, Okara.

S.A. Petition accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous lower court advocate from Dijkot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.