Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAURANG versus MALIK AYUB


Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 491 Habs Corpus was recovered from the Dento Police Post Detenio compound, which stated that the cattle had been in custody for about a month, said a livestock police officer in any case. No need and no one brought the livestock. Otherwise, because in any case, the police did not need Danteo, he had the freedom to go anywhere he liked, and to hand over the person claiming the cat's ownership, according to the lumbermar identified by the police officer. The order was given.

1986 P Cr. L J 754

[Lahore]

Before Sardar Muhammad Dogar, J

NAURANG‑‑Petitioner

Versus

MALIK AYUB and another‑‑Respondents

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 267/H of 1985, decided on 17th June, 1985

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

‑‑‑S. 491‑‑Habeas corpus‑‑Detenu recovered from premises of police post‑‑Detenu stating having been in custody for about a month alongwith fits cattle‑‑Police official stating that detenu was not required in any case and cattle having been brought in by somebody else‑‑Since detenu was not required by police in any case, he was set at liberty to go anywhere he liked and Police official was ordered to hand over catty' to person claiming ownership, on identification by Lambardar.

Nisar Ahmad Butt for Petitioner.

Date of hearing: 17th June, 1985.

ORDER

The bailiff has submitted the report. According to the report, Muhammad detenu, was found standing in the premises of the Police Post. The detenu had told the bailiff that he was in the custody of the police since about a month and so were his cattle. However, he did not complain any sort of maltreatment by the police.

2. Muhammad Ayub, S.I. informed the bailiff that he had not summoned the detenu, nor he was required in any case and that the cattle were also not brought by him. He also informed the bailiff that the cattle were brought by somebody else while found moving unattended.

3. The S.I. has stated in Court that Muhammad is not required in any case. He has repeated the story narrated by him to the bailiff about the cattle having been brought by somebody else. He has stated that Muhammad was asked by him to take away the cattle after giving proof of his ownership and since he had not produced any proof, the cattle were not released by him. However, he conceded that he had not taken any steps for disposal of the cattle in accordance with law. He has further stated that he is prepared to return the cattle to the detenu.

4. Since Muhammad is not required by the police in any case, he is set at liberty and may go wherever he likes.

5. The Sub‑Inspector is directed to hand over the cattle to the petitioner, who claims the ownership, on the identification of the Lambardar of the village of the petitioner.

The petitioner and the detenu have been informed that they may proceed against the respondents in any manner, for alleged illegal detention of Muhammad, if so advised.

The petition stands disposed of.

6. However, it is directed that a copy of the petition, a copy of the report of the bailiff and a copy of the order may be sent to the S.S.P., Faisalabad, who will look into the matter and also the conduct of the police officials.

S. A. Order accordingly accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
inheritance advocates near Cherat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.