Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AZEEM versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Crimes Against Section 382 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 Guarantee Name not mentioned in first report Is gone and not recognized. Parade was held after his arrest Needed further inquiry on his crime / innocence Bail is allowed

1986 P Cr. L J 310

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MUHAMMAD AZEEM and 4 others‑‑Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1255‑B‑85/BWP, decided on 22nd September, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) -

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 382‑‑Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S. 17‑‑Bail‑‑Name of accused not mentioned in first information report and' no identification parade was held after his arrest‑‑Question of his guilt/innocence requiring further inquiry‑‑Bail allowed.

K.A. Chauhan for Petitioners.

Ata Muhammad Baloch for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail by Muhammad Azim Khan, Abdul Mustafa, Shaaban, Abdul Hafeez and Abdul Ghafoor petitioners in case under section 382, P.P.C. and section 17 of the offence against property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 registered at P.S. Chishtian vide F.I.R. No. 152/85, dated 8‑6‑1985.

2. The allegations are that the petitioners and two others duly armed with fire‑arms came at Tahir Petroleum Service at 11 p.m. on 7‑6‑1985 and committed robbery.

3. The learned counsel has not pressed for the bail of Muhammad Azim Khan, Abdul Mustafa, Shaaban and Abdul Hafeez at this stage. He submitted that the name of Abdul Ghafoor petitioner No. 5 is not mentioned in the F.I.R. and as such a case for grant of bail to him is made out. The learned counsel for the State has however opposed the plea for the bail of Abdul Ghafoor on the ground that in his supplementary statement recorded after the registration of the case the complainant had named him as one of the culprits.

4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties. Be that as it may, the fact remains that the name of Abdul Ghafoor is not mentioned in the F.I.R. and no identification parade was held after his arrest, so the question of his guilt/innocence requires further enquiry. He is therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Chishtian.

5. It would be open to Muhammad Azim Khan, Abdul Mustafa, Shaaban and Abdul Hafeez petitioners, to apply for grant of bail a and when fresh ground arises in due course of events.

M.Y.H. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Pannu aqil lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.