Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2088/B of 1985,decided on 7th September,1985.
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 307/324/323/149 & 148‑‑Bail‑ Cross‑version‑‑Co‑accused also receiving four injuries out of which one was grievous‑‑Prosecution totally suppressing such injuries Injured prosecution witnesses and three others had also been challaned under Ss. 148, 324 and 325/149, P.P.C. and were on bail‑‑As to which party was guilty of aggression, yet to be seen‑‑Accused allowed bail in circumstances.
Abdul Wahid for the Petitioners.
Nemo for the State.
The petitioners alongwith Khan Muhammad co‑accused charged for murderously assaulting Muhammad Inayat and Muhammad Walayat P.Ws. with sticks and a hatchet on 8‑6‑1985. Seven injuries were found on the persons of Muhammad Inayat out of which one was grievous which is attributed to Khan Muhammad co‑accused. Seven simple injuries were found on the person of Muhammad Walayat P.W.
2. The motive for the offence was that Khan Muhammad aforementioned was constructing a wall of his house. Muhammad Inayat P.W. stopped him which led to an altercation between them. On the next day Khan Muhammad again started construction of the wall. Muhammad Inayat P.W. again objected whereupon Khan Muhammad and his companions attacked him and his brother Walayat.
3. Bail is urged on the grounds that there is a cross‑version. Khan Muhammad co‑accused had also received four injuries, out of which one was grievous. She informed P.Ws. and three others have also been challaned under sections 148, 324, 325/149, P.P.C. and they are on bail. The prosecution has totally suppressed his injuries. Khan Muhammad to whom the grievous injuries of Muhammad Inayat as alleged has not applied for bail. Challans of both the cases have been submitted to the Court, it is stated. It is further stated that the complainant party had no right to stop Khan Muhammad from constructing the wall.
4. As it is yet to be seen which party is guilty of aggression, I admit the petitioners to bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties each in the like, amount to the satisfaction of A Commissioner, Gujrat,
M.A.K. Bail allowed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer