Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus PARVEEN AKBTAR


The issuance of a Permanent Transfer Deed (PTD) on the basis of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958, sections 10 and 11 of the Settlement Scheme I, Paris 37, and 38 PTO denies transfer of the shop in dispute. Otherwise he is entitled to exchange the shop in whose name the PTO was issued but due to the inadvertent mistake of the Settlement Authority, the name of such exchange could not have been entered in the relevant judicial transfer order. As a Settlement Authority, the transfer order must be validated and the PTD should issue the transfer on such grounds. The PTO misunderstood a similar provision for further transfer rather than having a shop in dispute that the PTO issued in favor of the applicant / transfer not before the court order

1986 M L D 2578

[Lahore]

Before M. Mahboob Ahmad, J

Mst. MAQSOODA BIBI‑‑Petitioner

versus

SADIQ ALI‑‑Respondent

Transfer Application No.226‑C of 1986, decided on 2nd June, 1986.

West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)‑‑

‑‑‑S.25‑A‑‑Transfer of suit‑‑Petitioner wife apprehended her abduction and danger to life in case she appeared at place 'J' to defend suit for restitution of conjugal rights filed by husband against her‑‑Husband's suit for restitution of conjugal rights was transferred to place 'N' where petitioner wife was residing since she was turned out by husband and where her suit for dissolution of marriage against husband was pending prior to husband's suit.

Sardar Muhammad Anwar Khan for Petitioner.

Qazi Abdul Hayee for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 2nd June, 1986.

JUDGMENT

This application under section 25‑A of the Family Courts Act, 1964 seeks the transfer of the suit for restitution' of conjugal rights titled "Sadiq Ali v. Mst. Maqsooda Bibi" from the Judge Family Court, Jaranwala, District Faisalabad to the Judge Family Court, Nankana Sahib, District Sheikhupura.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the respondent has filed the suit for restitution of conjugal rights at Jaranwala after the suit for maintenance instituted against him by the petitioner at Nankana Sahib had been decreed just to cause harassment to the petitioner.

The next contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there being strained relations between the parties the petitioner who is a helpless poor woman has strong apprehension that she, would be abducted or bodily harmed if she goes to defend herself at Jaranwala, the place of residence of the respondent.

Lastly, the learned counsel has contended that the petitioner has been residing with her parents in Chak No.19/G.B. Tehsil Nankana Sahib, District Sheikhupura ever since she was turned out by the respondent from his house viz. for the last about four years and the respondent has never maintained her which has left the petitioner penniless and, therefore, unable to bear the expenses of litigation at another station.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent states that there is no objection to the transfer of the case.

4. In view of the above position, I accept this application and direct that the suit for restitution of conjugal rights titled "Sadiq Ali v. Mst. Maqsooda Bibi" be withdrawn from the Judge Family Court, Jaranwala and entrusted to the Judge Family Court, Nankana Sahib for adjudication in accordance with law.

The parties are, however, left to bear their own costs.

5. The parties are directed to appear before the transferee Court on 26‑6‑1986.

6. The Court from which the suit for restitution of conjugal rights titled "Sadiq Ali v. Mst. Maqsooda Bibi" has been withdrawn shall ensure that the record of the case reaches the transferee Court well in advance of the date fixed above.

H. B. T. Transfer application accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Hangu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.