Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus GHULAM KHAN


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Constitution Station House Officer allegedly harassing the applicant on the request of the other three respondents The petitioner's complaint was mainly directed against the police officer in which the applicant was directed. To contact the Superintendent of Police who was directed to look into it. Complain of it

1986 M L D 2214

[Lahore]

Before Zia Mahmood Mirza, J

GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner

versus

GHULAM KHAN and others‑‑Respondents

Writ Petition No.2522 of 1986, decided on 21st June, 1986.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art.199‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑Station House Officer was allegedly harassing petitioner at instance of other three respondents‑‑Petitioner's grievance was directed mainly against a police officer‑‑Petition disposed of with direction to petitioner to approach concerned Superintendent of police who was directed to look into his grievance.

Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azim for Petitioner.

ORDER

Petitioner has moved this constitutional petition praying' that "the respondents may kindly be stopped to dispossess the petitioner from his house and also save from the high‑handedness of the respondents who has created a lot of harassment to the petitioner's family and respondent No. 4 may kindly be directed to stop, illegal proceeding and coercive measures adopted by him.

2. It is alleged in this petition that respondents Nos.1 to 3 had got a false case registered against the petitioner under section 379, P.P. C. vide F.I.R. No.103, dated 10‑5‑1985 which case on investigation was found false and was; therefore, cancelled. It is further alleged that respondents Nos.1 to 3 in connivance with respondent No.4, who is S.H.O. Kamalia, are harassing the petitioner and forcing him to sell 'his house located in Chak No. 407/GB. It is stated that the petitioner has already made all the payments to the respondents for the purchase of buffaloes and nothing is due from him. Precise grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.4, who is a police officer, is harassing the petitioner at the instance of respondents Nos.1 to 3.

3. As the petitioner's grievance is directed mainly against respondent No.4, who is a police officer, he may approach S.P. Toba Tek Singh, who shall look into his grievance and take appropriate action warranted in the facts and circumstances of the ease. With these observations this petition stands disposed of.

H . A . K Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocate from Chak 4 b c lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.