Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUNIR KHAN versus STATE


Ordinance of Banks (Special Courts) (IX of 1984), Section 4A (6) Sanctions (XLV of 1860), Sections 409, 420, 468 471 Guarantees, Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) under Grant of Gross Amount Section 497 Written letter written by the accused, Rs 25,192, the handwriting can give the conclusion of the trial, wait, long interim bail which is already confirmed in the report.

1986 M L D 1764

[Lahore]

Before Javid Iqbal C.J. and Ijaz Nisar, J

Agha MUNIR KHAN‑‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2858 B of 1985, decided on 8th February, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

‑‑‑S.497‑‑Offences in Respect of Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance (IX Of 1984), Ss.4 a (6)‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.409, 420, 468 471‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Total sum alleged to have been embezzled by accused was Rs.25,192‑‑Handwriting.Fxpert's report awaited‑‑Conclusion of trial, held, might take long time‑‑interim bail already allowed confirmed in circumstances.

Hasnat Ahmad Khan for Petitioner.

Sardar Nazar Husain Dogar for the State.

ORDER

23‑12‑1985 record has not yet been received.

We have asked the learned counsel for the State to produce the record on the next date of hearing which is 19‑1‑1986

In the meantime the petitioner is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing security in the sum of Rs.30,000 (thirty thousand) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A . C. , Wazirabad.

JAVID IQBAL, C.J.‑‑

In continuation of our order, dated 23‑12‑1985 the total sum which is alleged to have been embezzled be the petitioner is Rs:25,192. The Handwriting Expert's report is still awaited. It may take a long time for the conclusion of the trial. In that view of the matter, we are of the view that the interim bail allowed to the petitioner should be confirmed on his furnishing security in the sum of Rs.60.000 instead of Rs.30,000 with two sureties each in .the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C., Wazirabad. Order accordingly. This petition is disposed of.

H.A.K Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Musafir Khana lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.