Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1 in Criminal Appeal No. 184 of 1986, decided on 28th April 1986.
‑‑‑S. 426--‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/34‑‑Suspension of sentence‑‑Accused armed with a Sota but part attributed to him was not that he used Sota but was stated to have held' deceased in Japha while others inflicted fatal blows at deceased‑‑Sentence suspended and accused admitted to bail.
Syed Kamal Mufti for Petitioner.
Malik Muhammad Yousaf for the State.
In continuation of our order, dated 5‑4‑1986 we have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Muhammad Hussain petitioner was stated to be armed with a Sota but the part attribute to him is not that he used Sota but on both occasions, he is stated 2 have held the deceased in Japha while the others inflicted fatal blow at the two deceased.
2. Since only Japha is attributed to Muhammad Hussain, petitioner, we suspend his sentence and admit him to bail subject to his furnishing security in the sum of Rs. 25,000 (Rupees Twenty‑five thousand only with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A . C . Kasur'.
3. This petition is disposed of.
M.Y.H. Sentence suspended.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer