Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ALAM SHER versus STATE


West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13 Evidence, Definition of Recovery of a Licensed Gun, Supported by an Independent Witness, There is no enmity with the accused. Besides, the Inspector-General of Police is present under the circumstances.

1986 M L D 1559

[Lahore]

Before Lehrasap Khan and Qurban Sadiq Ikram, JJ

ALAM SHER‑‑Appellant

Versus

THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 270 of 1983, decided on 11th June, 1986.

West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965)

‑‑‑5. 13‑‑Evidence, appreciation of‑‑Recovery of unlicensed gun supported by an independent witness, having no enmity with accused besides a Police Inspector‑‑Conviction maintained in circumstances.

Sardar Muhammad Latif Khan Khosa for Appellant.

Zafar Yasin for the State.

Dates of hearing: 26th, 27th May and 11th June, 1986.

JUDGMENT

QURBAN SADIQ IRKAM, J.‑‑

This is an appeal by Alam Sher against his conviction under section 13 of Arms Ordinance by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Multan who vide judgment, dated 21‑11‑1983 sentenced him to one year R.I.

2. The prosecution case in brief is that Alam Sher appellant was arrested in the connected murder case. _He on 2‑6‑1982 while in police custody led to the recovery of unlicensed .12 bore gun P.1 from his residential Kotha which was taken in possession vide memo. Exh. P. A. by Inspector Muhammad Shafi P.W.2 in presence of Nusrat P.W.1 and Allah Bakhsh F.W. (not examined). The prosecution examined P.W.1 Nusrat and P.W.2‑ Inspector Muhammad Shafi in support of its case. The accused denied the recovery and pleaded innocence. He did not produce any evidence in defence.

3. We have gone through the record of this case and have also heard the learned ‑ counsel for the appellant. Nusrat P.W. is an independent witness. He is not related to the deceased of the connected murder case. He has no enmity with Alam Sher appellant. Inspector Muhammad Shafi P.W.2 is also an independent witness. There is nothing to disbelieve the two witnesses. We, therefore, find no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed. The conviction and sentence of Alam Sher is maintained. This sentence will run concurrently with the sentences awarded to Alam Sher appellant in connected murder case.

S. G. D. Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocate from Toru lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.