Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NOOR HUSSAIN versus PIR BAKHSH


Interim Constitution Order 1981 Article 9 West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), Section 13 Constitutional Jurisdictional Mutual Orders Approved by the Controller of Rent Applicants to Applicants Against Such Interstate Order Denied interference with the appropriate statutory jurisdiction by

1986 M L D 869

[Lahore]

Before Manzoor Hussain Sial, J

NOOR HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner

versus

Haji PIR BAKHSH‑‑Respondent

Writ Petition No. 491 of 1984, decided on 7th February, 1984.

Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981)‑‑

‑‑‑Art.9‑‑West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), S.13‑‑Constitutional jurisdiction‑‑Interlocutory order passed by Rent Controller‑‑Adequate remedy by way of appeal available to petitioner against such interlocutory order‑‑Interference declined in constitutional jurisdiction.

Khawaja Saeed‑uz‑Zafar for Petitioner.

ORDER

This writ petition is directed against order, dated 19‑1‑1984 of the learned Rent Controller, Lahore whereby he did not allow production of certain documents on the record.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the learned Rent Controller acted ‑ arbitrarily in refusing to bring on the record the requisite documents while he had allowed the opposite party to produce similar documents on the file. He, however, did not deny that in the event an order of ejectment is finally passed against him the impugned interlocutory order would be assailable in appeal before the first appellate authority.

In this view of the matter, since another adequate remedy o appeal is available to the petitioner against the impugned interlocutor order, in case, an order of ejectment is passed against him this petition is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed in limine.

M . Y. H . Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Shikarpur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.