Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Section 497/498 (Infection of Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 and 16 abducted the marriage contract with the accused spouse properly registered The alleged kidnapper was in charge of his free will, as his wife, detainee, accused further investigation guaranteed.

1986 M L D 414(2)

[Lahore]

Before Khizar Hayat, J

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.900‑B of 1984, decided on 29th August, 1984.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S.497/498‑‑Offence of Zina (Enfocement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss.10 & 16‑‑Abductee contracted marriage with accused‑ Nikahnama properly registered produced‑‑Whether alleged abductee was living with accused of her free will as his wife, held, a case of further enquiry‑‑Bail granted to accused.

M.R. Khalid Malik for Petitioner.

Akhtar Masood for the State.

Date of hearing: 29th August, 1984.

ORDER

Muhammad Ramzan petitioner has applied for the grant of bail as he stands arrested under sections 10 and 16 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 since 12‑6‑1984.

2. According to the F.I.R. lodged by Ghulam Muhammad brother of the abductee Mst. Maryam aged 20/22 years. Muhammad Ramzan petitioner, developed illicit connection with the help of Allah Ditta with Mst. Manzooran and Mst. Allah Jawai. A case was registered at Police Station Shah Kot, District Sahiwal after a week of the alleged abduction. During the investigation the petitioner as well as the abductee were found together in Chak No.109/E.B. in the territorial jurisdiction of Police Station Ahmadyar. The abductee was recovered and the petitioner arrested. It may be stated that according to the Investigating Officer Mst. Manzooran, Mst. Allah Jawai and Allah Ditta co‑accused have been declared innocent.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as for the State and also perused the record.

4. According to the learned counsel, the abductee had contracted marriage with the petitioner of her own free will on 2‑5‑1984. He has also produced a Nikahnama which appears to be regularly registered under the Family Laws Ordinance with Union Council No.21, District Sahiwal. In the circumstances it requires further inquiry. Whether the abductee when found in the custody of the petitioner was living with him of her free will as her wife or under coercion.

5. Resultantly this petition is allowed. The petitioner shall be released on bail subject to his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs.10,000 (Rupees ten thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C/Duty Magistrate, Chichawatni.

S . A . Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Sidhnoti lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.