Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KHAN GHUL ALAS KHANOO versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/S.D. M., BIN KASSIM, KARACHI


Section 14 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975, the Constitution Order (1 of 1981), Article 9 confessed to the charges against the accused and the proceedings initiated against the accused in general.

1986 M L D 1210

[Karachi]

Before Nasir Won Zahid, J

KHAN GUL alias KHANOO‑‑Petitioner

Versus

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/S.D.M., BIN KASSIM, KARACHI Respondent

Constitutional Petition No.41 of 1983, decided on 12th April 1983.

Sind Crimes Control Act (VI of 1975)‑‑

‑‑‑S.14‑‑Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981), Art.9‑‑Quashing of proceedings‑‑Allegation against accused admittedly vague and of general character‑‑Proceedings initiated against accused and order passed by Tribunal, quashed in circumstances.

Muhammad Rafiq Khanzada for Petitioner.

M.I. Memon, A.A‑G. for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 12th April 1983.

JUDGMENT

Proceedings were initiated against the petitioner under the Sind Crimes Control Act of 1979 on the basis of the report submitted by the S.H.O., Korangi Police Station, Karachi. Learned Additional Advocate General, Mr. M.I. Memon, concedes that the allegations are vague and general in character and the proceedings are liable to be quashed. In the circumstances this Constitutional Petition is allowed and the proceedings initiated and pending against the petitioner under Sind Crimes Control Act, 1979 and the order, dated 2‑3‑1983 of the respondent, Assistant Commissioner and S.D.M., Bin Qasim are quashed. There will be no order as to costs.

It may be noted that the learned A.A.‑G. had contended that under the provisions of the Provisional Constitution Order no interim order could be passed in a Constitutional. Petition filed under Article 9 of Provisional Constitution in respect of any action taken for the detention of a person. This submission is not relevant at this stage as the petition is being disposed of finally.

S.A . Petition accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Miran Shah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.