Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD MOOSA versus STATE


Section 249A and 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Termination of Section 406 Proceedings A direct complaint pending in a judicial petition under Section 249A, the CRPC may continue the trial as long as That a civil action could not have taken place because of this action. Closing criminal proceedings remain in the same direction as civil proceedings end.

1986 M L D 1082

[Karachi]

Before Abdul Razzak A. Thahim, J

MUHAMMAD MOOSA and another‑‑Applicants

versus

THE STATE and another‑‑Respondents

Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.541 of 1982, heard on 14th April, 1986.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑Ss.249‑A & 561‑A‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.406‑‑Quashing of proceedings‑‑ Direct complaint pending in Court‑‑Application under S.249‑A, Cr.P.C. dismissed‑‑Civil suit pending‑‑Criminal proceedings, held, could be stayed till civil proceedings for same cause of action were terminated‑‑Criminal proceedings stayed in circumstances with direction to proceed as soon as civil proceedings were terminated.

1969 S C M R 411; 1971 P.Cr.L.J. 331; 1982 S C M R 85 and 1974 P.Cr.L.J. 541 ref.

Usman Ghani Rashid for Applicants.

Elahi Bux M. Sheikh for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 14th April, 1986.

JUDGMENT

This application under section 561‑A, Cr.P.C. has been filed to seek quashment of proceedings pending under section 406, P.P.C. in the Court of Civil Judge and F . C . M . Badin.

The case is that direct complaint under section 406, P.P.C. was filed by Haji Haroon against applicants in the Court of Civil Judge and F.C.M., Badin who after holding preliminary enquiry registered the case and issued bailable warrants against the applicants. They filed quashment application bearing No. Criminal Miscellaneous 947 of 1980 which was dismissed as withdrawn. Applicants then moved trial Court as provided under section 249‑A, Cr.P.C. but their application was dismissed and again they have filed this application.

Mr. Usman Ghani Rashid for the appellants contended that before this direct complaint, a civil suit was filed which is pending, therefore, in view of cases 1969 S C M R 411, 1971 P.Cr.L.J. 331, 1982 S C M R 85 and 1974 P.Cr.L.J. 541 the proceedings instituted before criminal case could be stopped.

Mr. Ellahi Bux Shaikh appearing for the respondent No.2 who is complainant submitted that civil suit has been decided and appeal is pending. He has no objection if proceedings of this case are stayed.

In view of the legal position and contentions of the learned counsel it is directed that criminal proceedings in this case are stayed but trial Court can proceed with the case as soon as civil proceedings for the same cause of action which are pending are terminated.

With these observations the application is disposed of.

S.A. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Alipur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.