HASHIM ASLAM BUTT versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE
Section Q Qununununununhadhadhadhad () ((((at ((((((10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10999999999999999999) Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution) The Constitution Petition was a special communications client advocate who, before Commissioner Inland Revenue, investigating the representation of his client, sought the applicant under Section 37 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. The client raised by the applicant. The information related to the Playa was that Article 9 (2) of the Law and Evidence entitles and protects the communication between the lawyer and the client. The petitioner was requested to disclose the identity of his client as the applicant was busy in the matter of 1984. In one case, through his client and the investigating authorities wanted to use the information which the applicant had in his While forwarding its investigation into the client, the current investigator did not disclose his identity to the investigating authorities, in which case the client's identity became privileged communication under Article 9 of the Convention of Evidence, 1984 Investigating Authorities They could not use the available machinery for investigative purposes when by a client The engaged lawyer was required to locate his client when the client's identity and investigation were underway. Investigating authorities could not force the applicant to disclose the identity of the applicant on the basis that he had contacted his client before any other forum. Representing or in any other case the identity of the client was given an opportunity to be communicated under Article 9 of the Martyrdom, 1984 High Court issued in the name of the applicant
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
