Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER


Article 3 ((())) Following the issue of proper cases in the High Court, the issue of leave is not allowed in the Supreme Court.

1985 S C M R 638

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ‑‑Petitioner

versus

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER exercising

the powers of Collector, Kasur and 2 others‑‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 722 of 1981 heard on 24th June, 1981.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 2‑6‑1981, passed in W.P. No. 2793 of 1981).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Main points having been adequately dealt with in High Court, permission to raise new points in Supreme Court at leave granting stage not granted‑‑There being no justification for interference‑‑Leave to appeal refused.

Ch. Mushtaq Ahmad Khan, Advocate and S. Wajid Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 24th June,.1981.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑

‑ Leave to appeal has been sought from judgment, dated 2‑6‑1981, of the Lahore High Court; whereby a Constitutional Petition arising out of orders of maintenance passed in favour of respondent No. 3, was dismissed.

We have heard the learned counsel on the main points raised before the High Court, namely, whether adequate opportunity of defending the case was afforded to the petitioner, and whether the amount of maintenance, i.e. Rs.500 per mensem could be fixed in this case. Both the points were adequately dealt with by the learned Judge in the High Court. In the circumstances of this case, there was no justification for the High Court for interference.

We do not consider it a fit case for grant of permission to the learned counsel to raise new points. This petition accordingly is dismissed.

M.I. Leave refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Sarai Alamgir lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.