Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Criminal Petitions Nos. 24 and 25‑R(S) of 1984, decided on 28th October, ,1984.
(From judgment, dated 23‑5‑1984 of the Federal Shariat Court in Criminal Appeals Nos. 102/L and 109‑L of 1983 in both petitions).
‑‑‑Art.203‑F‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hadood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.4‑‑Leave to appeal granted to examine evidence in order to see whether principles for administration of criminal justice have been followed in resolving contradictions between different statements made under oath by abductee.
Nemat Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Iqbal Ahmed Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (absent).
Nemo for the State (in both Cr. Ps.) .
Date of hearing: 28th October, 1984.
‑‑ After hearing the learned counsel and going through the deposition of Mst. Zubaida the abductee, we consider it a fit case to examine evidence, in order to see whether principles for administration of Criminal justice have been followed in resolving the contradictions between different statements made under oath by her.
M. I. Order accordingly.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer