Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NUR HAYAT NOON versus ADDITIONAL CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB


Article 4 ((P)) concession to the petitioner's claim that the Supreme Court had already given leave in respect of the question raised in the present petition and said that the petitions were also heard and the judgment reserved. In which the appeal is allowed.
1985 S C M R 126

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah and M.S.H. Quraishi, JJ

Malik NUR HAYAT NOON and others--Petitioners

versus

ADDITIONAL CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB and another--Respondents

Civil Petitions Nos. 70 and 71 of 1977, decided on 3rd June, 1984.

(On appeal from the judgment, dated 20-12-1976 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Writ Petitions Nos. 1402/74 and 1088/74)

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)--

---Art. 185(3)--Leave to appeal--Petitioner contending that leave had already been granted by Supreme Court with regard to question raised in present petition and appeals arising out of said petitions had even been heard and judgment reserved therein--Leave to appeal granted.

Kh. Tariq Rahim, Advocate Supreme Court and Kh. Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners in both the C.Ps.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 3rd June, 1984.

ORDER

NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.--

This order will govern C.P.S.L.A. No.70 of 1977 and Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal Vo.71 of 1977, as the common questions of law arise in the said petitions.

According to the learned counsel of the petitioners, leave has already been granted by this Court in C.P.S.L.A. No.240-R of 1976 (Muhammad Tahir Shah etc. v. Federal Land Commission Pak. Secretariat No.8, Rawalpindi, etc.) and C.P.S.L.A. No.241-R of 1976 (Muhammad Ali Shah etc. v. Federal Land Commission, Pak. Secretariat No.3, Rawalpindi etc.) with regard to the questions raised in these petitions. In fact, according to the learned counsel, the appeals arising out of these petitions have even been heard and the judgment is reserved therein.

Leave is, accordingly, granted in these cases also.

These petitions shall be made ready on the present record with liberty to the parties to add further documents, if any.

Security in the sum of Rs.1,000.

The appeals shall be put up for hearing as soon as the judgment in the appeals referred to above is announced.

M.Z.M. Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Sangla Hill lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.