Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SIKANDAR ALI KHAN versus MUQARRAB JEHAN BEGUM


Article 4 (185 ()) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXN464 of XNXV), the decree of the section decree restoration will allow an appeal to be considered as to whether this decree is merely a suit. And not from the date when the wife started living apart from her husband. And whether the restitution allowance set by the trial court included a pocket allowance

1985 S C M R 2079

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain Nasim Hasan Shah and Shafiur Rahman, JJ

SIKANDER ALI KHAN PETITONER

Versus

Mst. MUQARRAB JEHAN BEGUM AND OTHERS Respondents

Civil Petition No.518 of 1984,decied on 30th April 1985

(On appeal from the judgment dated 21-03-1984of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in writ petition No.1919 of 1982).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), S.5‑ Maintenance‑‑Decree‑‑Leave to appeal granted to consider questions whether decree could be operative only from date of institution of suit and not from date when wife started to live separately from husband and whether maintenance allowance fixed by trial Court was inclusive of pocket allowance.

Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 30th April, 1985.

ORDER

NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.

‑‑Submits firstly that the decree could be operative only from 30‑4‑1976, namely, the date of the institution of the suit and not from 22‑4‑1974 when the wife started to live separately from her husband; and secondly, that in any case' the maintenance allowance fixed by the trial Court was Rs.100 (inclusive of Rs.50 per month as pocket allowance) and not Rs.150 as erroneously assumed by the High Court.

These questions require further consideration. Leave to appeal is, accordingly, granted.

Security in the sum of Rs.1,000.

The appeal to be made ready on the present record with liberty to the parties to filed additional documents, if any and put up for hearing in the month of November,1985.

The interim stay order dated 5‑3‑1985 is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall pay the maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs.100 from 30‑4‑1976 and this amount will be deposited with the Assistant Registrar of this Court within two months who will deposit the same in a special account and the amount will be payable to the respondent' as soon as she applies to this Court for its payment. In case the petitioner fails to deposit the amount, as directed, the appeal shall be liable to dismissal for non‑prosecution.

M . Y . H Petition allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Thana Bula Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.