Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Petition No. 170 of 1981, decided on 7th May, 1985.
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 3‑12‑1980 of the Lahore High Court in Civil Revision No. 1934 of 1980).
‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Leave to appeal, grant of‑‑Petitioner unable to show any law or principle of general importance having been violated by Courts below‑‑Petition for leave to appeal dismissed.
M.M. Saeed Beg, Advocate Supreme Court with Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record Respondent in person.
Date of hearing: 7th May, 1985.
‑‑The suit filed by the respondent for a declaration that the termination of his service was illegal, ultra vires and of no legal effect was decreed to the extent that the order, dated 3‑12‑1966 was held as void and of no legal effect. The petitioner Government challenged this order by filing an appeal before the Additional District Judge which was dismissed by him vide order, dated 27‑4‑1980 and the revision filed to challenge the said order in the High Court also failed. Hence this petition for leave to appeal in this Court.
We have heard Mr. M.M. Saeed Beg in support of this petition. He has not been able to show that any law or principle of general importance has been violated by the Courts below. Hence there is not force in this petition which is accordingly dismissed hereby.
M.I. Petition dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer