Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 839 of 1984, decided on the November, 1984).
(Against the order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 16‑7‑1984, passed in Writ Petition No. 3155 of 1984) .
‑‑‑Arts. 185(3) h 199‑‑West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), S. 15‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑Petitioners seeking High Court to reappraise evidence and reverse judgment of Rent Controller District Judge‑‑Writ petition, held, was not competent‑‑Leave to appeal refused.
Abdul Rehman Bajwa v. Sultan and 9 others P L D 1981 S C 522 rel.
M. Ahmad Hassan Khan, Advocate Supreme Court with Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
Nemo for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 4th November, 1984.
The petitioners seek leave to appeal against the order of the High Court, dated 16‑7‑1984, dismissing their writ petition in a rent matter.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and going through the impugned order we notice that in their Constitutional petition, the petitioners only required the High Court to reappraise the evidence and reverse the judgment of the Rent Controller and the learned Additional District Judge We are of the view that the Constitutional petition filed by the petitioners was not competent in view of the observation by this Court in Abdul Rehman Bajwa v. Sultan and 9 others P L D 1981 S C 522.
Even otherwise the petitioners have no case.
3. The petition is consequently dismissed with costs.
M.I. Petition dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer