Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Appeals Nos. 106 and 107 of 1971, decided on .3rd February, 1985.
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore dated 19‑1‑1970 in C.R.Nos. 456 and 457 of 1964).
‑‑‑O.XXIII, r.3‑‑Compromise‑‑Counsel for contesting sides requesting for disposal of appeals in accordance with written compromise‑‑Terms of compromise being reasonable, appeals disposed of accordingly.
Sh. Rafiq Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court and M.A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Appellant (in both Appeals).
Ch. Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court and S. Inayat Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents Nos. 1, 2 and 3 (in both Appeals).
Date of hearing: 3rd February, 1985.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the contesting sides, having placed on record a compromise duly signed by them besides others, request for the disposal of these appeals in terms thereof. The compromise reads as follows:
< --[if gte vml 1]>
The terms of the compromise appear to be reasonable. These appeals are disposed of in terms of the afore‑recorded compromise. There shall be no order as to costs.
M. I.
Order accordingly.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer