Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus LMTIAZ MUHAMMAD


Article 212 (3) of the Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), the Section 13 Service Tribunal, ordered the payment of full salary and allowance for the period of suspension, mandatory retirement that the suspension order was approved without legal authority. The order was issued by the officer. Leave to consider, among other things, whether a false doctrine prevails with the Tribunal
1985 S C M R 875

Present: Abdul Kadir Shaikh and Shafiur Rahman, JJ

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others Petitioners

versus

Kh. IMTIAZ MUHAMMAD‑‑Respondent

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No.676 of 1984, decided on 9th October, 1984.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art. 212 (3)‑‑Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), S.13‑‑Compulsory retirement from service‑‑Service. Tribunal directing payment of full pay and allowances for period of suspension on ground that order of suspension was passed without lawful authority‑‑Order having been issued by authorised officer, leave granted to consider inter alia, whether e mistaken view had prevailed with tribunal.

Sh.Maqbool Ahmad, Standing Counsel with Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Sh.Munir Ahmed, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 9th October, 1984.

ORDER

ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J

.‑‑This is a petition for leave to appeal from the judgment of Federal Service Tribunal dated 13‑3‑1984 by which while upholding the order of respondent's compulsory retirement from service, Tribunal directed payment of full pay and allowances,. including increments, to respondent for the entire period he remained under suspension for the reason that the order of suspension from service passed by the Auditor‑General was without lawful authority.

Shaikh Maqbool Ahmed, learned Standing Counsel appearing in support of the petition has produced before us a copy of the order of respondent's suspension from service issued under letter No.207‑Dy(E)/ 5‑77, dated 28‑5‑1977 in support of the submission that the Federal Tribunal has failed to notice that the order of suspension was issued by the Auditor‑General (Authorised Officer) with the approval of the "Authority", namely, the President of Pakistan, and unfortunately a mistaken view has prevailed with the Tribunal.

This submission, amongst others, deserves consideration. We therefore grant leave and allow the petition.

Appeal will be heard at an early date on the present record, but it is open to the parties to file additional documents.

The operation of the impugned portion of the order of the Tribunal is suspended, provided respondent is paid one‑half portion of the salary due to him.

M. I. Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firms from Kotla Jam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.