Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD, ISLAMABAD


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 37 and 38 Appellate Jurisdiction Punjab Appellate Tribunal Limited A Federal Territory for Appeals arising out of the decisions of the Labor Courts in Punjab, Islamabad, Islamabad, not under the jurisdiction of the President of the Punjab Labor Appeal Tribunal. Order 12, 1971, the Government of the Government shall exercise the same powers in relation to the Capital Territory of Islamabad as had been exercised by West Pakistan before July, 1970, unless the Punjab Appellate Tribunal has been appointed by the Punjab Government through the Labor Court. The authority to hear appeals and reviews against the decisions was not granted So, not helpful. Islamabad
1985 P L C 536

[Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab]

Present: Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi,

Appellate Tribunal

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ

Versus

PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD, ISLAMABAD

Appeal No. ID‑671 of 1984, decided on 18th November, 1984.

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑--

‑‑‑Ss.37 & 38‑‑Appeal‑‑Jurisdiction‑‑Jurisdiction of Punjab Appellate Tribunal‑‑Limited to appeals arising from decisions of Labour Courts functioning in Punjab‑‑Islamabad a Federal territory‑‑Labour Court, Islamabad‑‑Not within jurisdiction of Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal‑ President Order 12 of 1971, authorized Government of Punjab to exercise same powers in relation to Islamabad capital territory as were exercisable by Government of West Pakistan before July, 1970, held, not helpful unless Punjab Appellate Tribunal is authorised by Government of Punjab to hear appeals and revisions against decisions of Labour Court, Islamabad.

Malik Ghulam Rasool for Appellant.

Date of hearing: 17th November, 1984.

JUDGMENT

The appeal captioned above is directed against the decision, dated 18‑10‑1984 recorded by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Islamabad, dismissing the grievance petition of the appellant.

2. This Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear appeals arising from the decisions made by the Labour Courts functioning in Punjab. The Labour Court the decision of which has been challenged in this appeal is not functioning in Punjab and the case is also not of the establishment situated in Punjab. It has been argued that no separate Appellate Tribunal for Islamabad territory has been appointed, so this tribunal is competent to hear appeals arising from the decisions of Labour Court, Islamabad. The contention has no force. Unless this tribunal is authorised to dispose of such appeal it has no jurisdiction. In a case titled as Saleem Akhtar Mughal v. Federal Bank for Co‑operatives, President's Order No.12 of 1971 was cited but that too is not helpful. The President of Pakistan has by means of the said order authorised the Government of the Punjab to exercise same powers in relation to Islamabad capital territory as were exercisable by the Government of West Pakistan before July, 1970. Since the Government of the Punjab has not authorised this tribunal to hear appeals and revisions arising from the decisions and orders of Labour Court, Islamabad, the said President's order is not helpful.

3. As a result, the memo. of appeal be returned to the appellant.

A. E.

Appeal not entertained.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous lower court advocate from Dadakhel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.