Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NUSRAT BIBI versus ABDUL GHAFAR


West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 Section 25 Family suit Applicant's exchange of claim that he is a resident of District \ L of and intends to transfer a lawsuit to restore marital rights from District \ S from. District L \ L fact In fact, the trial court's decision was to move the district \ L direction with direction, if the trial court at trial L at concludes that it has no jurisdiction then that district \ L from. Will move from the situation. District \ S \ Request allowed

1985 C L C 2693

[Lahore]

Before Abaid Ullah Khan, J

Mst. NUSRAT BIBI--Petitioner

Versus

ABDUL GHAFAR--Respondent

Transfer Application No. 55-C of 1983, decided on 28th February, 1983.

West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)--

---S. 25-A--Transfer of family suit--Petitioner/wife claiming to be resident of District 'L' and intending transfer of suit for restitution of conjugal rights from District 'S'--Held, that question whether or not she was resident of District 'L' was matter of fact to be decided by trial Court--Suit transferred to District 'L' with direction, if trial Court at 'L' came to conclusion that it had no jurisdiction such suit will stand transferred from District 'L' to District 'S'--Petition allowed in circumstances.

Muhammad Sharif Butt for Petitioner.

Muhammad Akmal Saleemi for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 28th February, 1983.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the respondent contends that Mat. Nusrat Bibi, petitioner, is not ordinary resident of Lahore and that she actually belongs to Chak No. 46/EB, Tehsil Pakpattan, District Sahiwal, where her marriage with the respondent was solemnized. He seriously objects to the territorial jurisdiction of Family Court at Lahore to entertain her cause. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on the other hand, states that she lives with her maternal-uncle at Lahore and that the Family Court at Lahore has jurisdiction to try and decide her suit. The question whether or not she is resident of Lahore is one of fact and will have to be decided by the trial Court. If the trial Court at Lahore comes to the conclusion that it has no jurisdiction it will return A the plaint to the petitioner and in that event the suit for restitution of conjugal rights brought by the respondent against her will stand transferred back to the Court of Mr. Ghulam Rasul Ranjha, Judge, Family Court, Okara, from where it is withdrawn and transferred to the Court of Mr. Iftikhar Hussain Shah, Judge, Family Court, Lahore. The parties have been directed to appear before the Court of Mr. Iftikhar Hussain Shah, Judge, Family Court, Lahore, on the 14th March, 1983. H.B.T. Petition allowed.

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.