NAWABZADA MUHAMMAD NADIR KHAN HOTI versus CENTRAL SELECTION BOARD (C.S.B.) (ADVISORY BODY)
Section 9 (2) (a) Government Employees (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules, 1973, Articles 7, 7A and 8 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 10A and 1991 Constitutional Request Promotion, Toll Trial Trial Trial Prevented Government Employee There was no appropriate opportunity to explain the position that the applicant had questioned on the recommendations of the Central Selection Board before the matter was decided against it. It was the fundamental right of the applicant that the civil and criminal rights determination process must pass a fair and procedural class examination at every stage, the Central Selection Board cannot blindly rely and on the basis of the impression a negative Can't approve order. The Central Selection Board directed the Central Selection Board, without first having to present the concrete evidence against an officer by the members of the Central Selection Board, and then before the said officer before the said officer. The amended publicity policy was to set good-purpose objective standards and reconsider the applicant's civil servant case.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
