Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AUQAF versus ZAFARULLAH


Interim Constitution Order 1981 Article 9 The Punjab Waqf Properties Ordinance (IV of 1979), passed by the Additional District Judge on the application filed under Section 11 of the Section 11 Revision Ordinance, 1979 such order was reviewed, not authorized, in the ordinance. No existing clause exists, enabling the 1979 District Judge to review his order

1985 C L C 2033 (1)

[Lahore]

Before C.A. Rahman, J

A U QA F--Petitioner

Versus

ZAFARULLAH and another--Respondents

Writ Petition No. 4082 of 1984, heard on 7th October, 1984.

Provisional Constitution Order (I of 1981)--

---Art. 9---Punjab Waqf Properties Ordinance (IV of 1979), S. 11--Review--Order passed by Additional District Judge on application filed under. S. 11 of Ordinance, 1979--Review of such order, held, not competent--No provision existing in Ordinance, 1979 enabling District Judge to review his order--Order passed on review set aside. Ehsanul Haq Chaudhry for Petitioner. Sher Zaman Khan for Respondents. Date of hearing: 7th October, 1984.

JUDGMENT

In this writ petition order, dated 16-5-1984 passed by She learned Additional District Judge had been challenged on the ground that the learned Additional District Judge was not legally competent to review his earlier order, dated 2-2-1984 whereby he had dismissed the application of Zafarullah respondent No. 1 which lie had filed under section 11 of the Punjab Waqf Properties Ordinance, 1979. 2. Mr. Sher Zaman Khan, Advocate, who has filed an appeal against the aforementioned order, dated 2-2-1984 passed by the learned Additional District Judge in this Court has appeared on behalf of Zafarullah respondent No. 1 and has frankly conceded that the order, dated 16-5-1984 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Lahore, which has been challenged in the present writ petition is not legally sustainable because there is no provision in the Punjab Waqf Properties Ordinance, 1979 under which the District Judge could review his order. 3. In view of the above legal position stated by the parties' counsel this writ petition is allowed and order, dated 16-5-1984 passed by the learned Additional District Judge is declared to be illegal and without jurisdiction. No order is made as to costs. M.Y.H . Petition allowed.

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.