Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ASGHAR ALI versus KHUSHI MUHAMMAD


Pending against the applicant under Section 1 Code1 / 202020, trial for termination of proceedings, termination of application proceedings, PPC admitted for full hearing nine years ago, no useful purpose, held Will be taken, action will be taken against it. The applicants' situation was abolished at the same stage

1985 P Cr. L J 2440

[Lahore]

Before Javid Iqbal, C J

ASGHAR ALI‑‑Petitioner

versus

KHUSHI MUHAMMAD‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 279 of 1976, decided on 4th June, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S. 561‑A‑‑Quashing of proceedings‑‑Petition, seeking quashing of proceedings, pending against petitioner under S. 406/420, P.P.C. admitted for full hearing about nine years back‑‑No useful purpose, held, would be served to proceed against petitioner at such a belated stage‑‑Proceedings quashed, in circumstance.

Allah Wasaya Malik for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondent.

ORDER

This is a petition under section 561‑A, Cr. P. C. for quashment of proceedings pending against the petition under section 406/420, P.P.C. in the Court of M.I.C. Okara. Learned counsel states that the petition was admitted for full hearing in 1976 for the main reason that the petitioner belonged to Jaranwala District Lyallpur and that he did not even know the respondent who had filed a false complaint against the petitioner at Okara in order to harass him. It is submitted that in the complaint it is alleged that the petitioner borrowed six gold bangles, Gluband, etc. from the respondent on the pretext that the marriage of the petitioner's daughter was ensuing and that the ornaments would be returned to the complainant a month after the marriage. It is alleged that the ornaments were handed over to the petitioner in the presence of Mushtaq and Zafar Ali. Thereafter it is alleged that the respondent found out that no marriage of the petitioner's daughter had taken place and that the ornaments had been misappropriated. It is contended that the complaint is frivolous and it was an abuse of process of the Court. Neither the respondent is known to the petitioner nor the witnesses who are mentioned by him. The petitioner is a respectable of his area and this litigation has been initiated against him possibly at the instigation of his rivals, namely, Sardar Ahmed and Riaz Ahmed sons of Haji Ali Muhammad of his village. Be that as it may, it is an old matter of 1976 and no useful purpose will be served to proceed against the petitioner at this belated stage. In that view of the matter A the proceedings pending against the petitioner under the aforesaid sections in 'the form of a private complaint instituted by the respondent in the Court of M.I.C. Okara are hereby quashed. This petition is disposed of.

S. G. D. Proceedings quashed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
power of attorney advocate Sarai Alamgir lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.