Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM MUSTAFA versus THE STATE


The accused, who allegedly offered the money to the driver of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 161 and 165, did not disclose that the driver to whom the money was offered was a civil servant. A government employee, caught, not born, has been acquitted

1985 P Cr. L J 2144

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

GHULAM MUSTAFA Appellant

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Appeal No.40 ‑of 1982, heard on 10th November1984.

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

----‑Ss. 161 & 165‑A‑‑Accused allegedly offering money as illegal gratification to driver of Magistrate‑‑‑ Record not showing that driver to whom money was offered was a public servant‑‑Question of conviction of accused under S.165‑A for abetment of offence of acceptance of illegal gratification by a public servant, held, did not arise‑‑Accused acquitted.

Masood Sadiq Mirza for Appellant.

Muhammad Ali Naqvi for the State.

Date of hearing: 10th November, 1984.

JUDGMENT

This criminal appeal arises from the judgment of the learned Senior Special Judge, Anti‑Corruption, Punjab, Lahore whereby he on 25‑1‑1982 convicted Ghulam Mustafa appellant under section 161 read with section 165‑A, P.P.C. and sentenced him to 15 months' R.I.

2. The appellant was a butcher. The charge against him was that he offered Rs.50 as illegal gratification to Riaz Shahid a driver of the Magistrate.

3. After hearing the learned counsel, I feel inclined to accept the appeal on the short ground that there being nothing on record to show that the driver to whom the money was offered was a public servant, therefore, the question of conviction of the appellant under section 165‑A for abetment of offence of acceptance of illegal gratification by a public servant does not arise.

4. For what has been stated above, this appeal is accepted. The conviction and sentence is set aside and the appellant is acquitted of the charge.

H.A.

Appeal accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Chakwal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.