Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KHALID SHARIF MALIK versus THE STATE


Section 514 of the Criminal Code (CRPC) and 439 confiscation of bail rules The weak person had paid some money from the accused to the complainant in case of rain; Has been reduced to 2,00G

1985 P Cr. L J 1448

[Lahore]

Before Rustam S. Sidhwa, J

KHALID SHARIF MALIK‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Revision No. 197 of 1981, decided on 26th February, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑Ss. 514 & 439‑‑Revision‑‑Forfeiture of surety bond‑‑Surety a poor person had made certain payments on behalf of accused to complainant in rain case‑‑Amount of penalty recoverable from petitioners reduced from Rs.5,000 to Rs.2,00G in circumstances.

M. Ilyas Malik for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 26th February, 1985.

JUDGMENT

This is a revision petition filed by Khalid Sharif Malik, petitioner, against the appellate judgment of the District Magistrate, Faisalabad, dated 13‑1‑1981 dismissing his appeal. Earlier, a First Class Magistrate of Faisalabad had forfeited the surety bond furnished by the petitioner in proceedings under section 514, Cr.P.C. and ordered the petitioner to pay the full sum of the surety bond i.e. Rs.5,000.

2. This petition was admitted only to consider the quantum of the penalty to be recovered from the petitioner. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner in this respect. It is submitted that the petitioner is a poor person and that in the main case he had also made certain payment on behalf of the accused to the complainant in partial payment of his debt. Taking all circumstances into consideration, I would reduce the amount of penalty to be recovered from the petitioner from Rupees Five Thousand (Rs.5,000) to Rupees Two Thousand (Rs.2,000).

3. For the foregoing reasons, this petition stands partially accepted, in term of reduction of the penalty payable by the petitioner on the bond, as stated above.

M. A. K. Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Muzaffargarh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.