Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GUL MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Section 497 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 11 and 16 bail, grant of the applicant designated in the FIR and the prosecution also filed under Section 164 In the case of the PC Petitioner, his accompanying partner and both abducted prosecutors, the circumstances are not conducive to the grant of bail.

1985 P Cr. L J 1054

[Lahore]

Before Gulbaz Khan, J

MUHAMMAD ANWAR‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3449‑B of 1984, decided on 18th December, 1984.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S.497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss.11 & 16‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Petitioner named in F.I.R. and prosecutrix also involving him in her statement recorded under S.164, Cr.P.C.‑‑Petitioner accompanying co‑accused and both abducting prosecutrix‑‑Held, not a fit case for grant of bail, in circumstances.

S. M. Tayyab for Petitioner.

Abdul Hayee Gillani for the State.

ORDER

The case was registered under sections 11 and 16 of Ordinance VII of 1979, on 20‑9‑1984, on the statement of Muhammad Yaqub. The complainant had named the petitioner and Muhammad Shafiq alias Kala co‑accused in the F.I.R. Said Muhammad Shafiq alias Kala is mother's sister's son of Mst. Razia. After recovery, Mst. Razia made statement under section 164, Cr. P. C. She disclosed in her statement that she was abducted by her cousin Muhammad Shafiq alias Kala and Muhammad Anwar petitioner at pistol point and threatened with death She further alleged that Muhammad Shafiq alias Kala had committed Zina‑bil‑Jabr with her. The petitioner was named in the F.I.R. Mst. Razia also involved him in her statement under section 164, Cr.P.C. He had accompanied the co‑accused and both of them had abducted Mst. Razia. The offence of abduction is equally serious. It is not a fit case for bail. The petition is dismissed.

S. G. D Bail declined

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Sanghi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.