Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

INAYAT BANG versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER


Pakistan Penal Code Section Pakistan Pen Pakistan Prevention of Corruption Act (Second Act II II 1947), section 30 (Crimes under section, PPC does not have a specific offense, Special Judge Anti-Corruption, Detention, In these circumstances , The accused had no jurisdiction to exclude the conviction and sentence. (Scope)

1985 P Cr. L J 100 (1)

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MUHAMMAD IQBAL‑‑Appellant

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 1109 of 1977, heard on 8th July, 1984.

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)‑‑

---S.430‑‑Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), S.5(2)‑‑Jurisdic tion‑‑Offence under S. 430, P.P.C. not a specified offence‑‑Special Judge Anti‑Corruption, held, had no jurisdiction to try accused‑ Conviction and sentence set aside, in circumstances.‑‑(Jurisdiction).

Ghulam Hussain Qureshi for Appellant.

Mian Mushtaq for the State.

Date of hearing: 8th July, 1984.

JUDGMENT

This criminal appeal arises from the judgment of the learned Senior Special Judge Anti‑Corruption, Punjab, Lahore whereby he on 7‑11‑1977 convicted Muhammad Iqbal Patwari appellant under section 430, P.P.C. read with section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and sentenced him till rising of the Court and a fine of Rs.500 in default thereof to further R.I. for six months.

2. Since after hearing the learned counsel for the parties I am inclined to accept this appeal on the ground of lack of jurisdiction of the learned Senior Special Anti‑Corruption, Punjab, Lahore to try the appellant for the commission of offence under section 430, P.P.C. therefore I need not set out the facts in detail and enter into the merits of the case. Admittedly the offence punishable under section 430, P.P.C. is not a specified offence. On this short ground, I am of the view that the trial Court has no jurisdiction to try the appellant for the offence under section 430, P.P.C. read with section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947.

For what has been stated above, the appeal is accepted and the conviction and sentence of the appellant is set aside. Since there was no legal trial, therefore, I am not in a position to convict or acquit the appellant. The fine, if paid be refunded to the appellant.

S. G. D. Appeal allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Swatmingora lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.