Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FAROOQ AZAM versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 498 Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Section 406, 420 These 411 bail prior to the arrest, the wagon approval in the dispute was sold to the applicant for 50,000 under a written contract which The complainant received an advance and balance of Rs 10,000 and was required to pay monthly installment of Rs 2,000 but the applicant failed to pay the balance and instead sold the wagon to the third person, a civil case was heard. In the case of, the applicant granted bail.

1985 P Cr. L J 85

[Lahore]

Before Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J

Z A K A ULLA H‑‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2119‑B of 1984, decided on 15th August, 1984.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

---S. 498‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.406, 420 It 411‑‑Bail before arrest, grant of‑‑Wagon in dispute sold to petitioner for Rs. 50,000 under a written agreement whereby complainant received Rs. 10,000 in advance and balance was to be paid in monthly instalment of Rs. 2,000 but petitioner failed to pay balance and instead sold wagon to a third person‑‑Held, a case of civil nature‑‑Petitioner allowed bail, in circum stances.

Muhammad Aslam Sandhu for Petitioner.

Irshad Ahmad for the State.

Date of hearing: 15th August, 1984.

ORDER

Masood Aslam Shah complainant sold Wagon No. RIH. 3496 for Rs. 50,000 to Zaka Ullah petitioner. An agreement was executed on 23‑7‑1983. The wagon was delivered to Zaka Ullah petitioner by the complainant after receiving Rs. 10,000 in cash according to this agreement. The remaining amount of Rs. 40,000 was to be paid by the Zaka Ullah petitioner to Masood Aslam complainant by instalments at the rate of Its. 2,000 per month. It is contended that accused had not paid the balance of Rs. 40,000 and instead had sold the wagon to a third person. On this allegation the present case was registered against the accused. He did not succeed to secure pre‑arrest bail from the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Lahore. Hence this petition for pre‑arrest bail.

2. From the facts mentioned above, I am of the view that it is a case of civil nature. In this view of the matter, the petitioner is allowed bail before arrest on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate, Model Town, Lahore. The petitioner will join investigation of this case as and when required by the Investigation Officer. If he fails to join investigation, an application for cancellation of bail can be made before the Sessions Judge, Lahore Court, is illegal.

S. G. D. Bail allowed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Sambrial lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.