Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAZAR HUSSAIN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 354 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10/18 Case originally filed under Section 345, PPC There is no charge to try. CCPI witnesses do not support such allegations against the accused bail in order to commit the abuse reported in Section 173.

1985 M L D 1386

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

NAZAR HUSSAIN--Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1485/B/BWP of 1984, decided on 20th November, 1984.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 354--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 10/18 Case originally registered under S. 345, P.P.C.--No allegations of attempt to commit rape made in report under S. 173, Cr.P.C.--Eye-witnesses also not supporting such allegations against accused--Bail granted.

R.A. Ghauri for Petitioner.

M.A. Hameed for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Nazar Hussain petitioner in a case under section 354, P.P.C. and section 10/18 of the Offence of Zino (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 registered at P.S. Taranda Muhammad Panah, vide F.I.R. No. 84/84.

2. According to the F.I.R., the prosecution case was that the petitioner criminally assaulted Mst. Bashiran, caught hold of her breasts and tried to commit rape upon her after having untied her trouser.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the eye-witnesses in their statements recorded under section 161, Cr.P.C. have not supported the allegations of attempt to commit rape and at the worst, the act of the petitioner would fall within the purview of section 354, P.P.C. Conversely, the learned counsel for the State has opposed the plea for bail of the petitioner.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties with care I find that originally the case was registered under section 354, P.P.C.; that in report under section 173, Cr.P.C., there are no allegations of attempt to commit rape, that the eye-witnesses namely Mst. Mannan, Ghulam Akbar and Gehna have not supported the allegations of attempt to commit rape.

5. For what has been stated above, without making expression o opinion lest it may prejudice the merits of the case. I feel inclined to admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of 88.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C /Duty Magistrate. Liaqatpur.

S.A. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.