Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

RAZIA BIBI versus STATE


Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Section 497 Adultery with adultery participant, accused accused of being a woman

1985 M L D 1337

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

Mst. RAZIA BIBI--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 881-B/BWP. of 1985. decided or. 16th July, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10(2) & 16--Bail, grant of--Accused not a consenting party to her abduction according to F.I.R.--No direct evidence of commission of Zina by her with co-accused--Accused being a woman her case, held, fell within proviso to S. 497, Cr.P.C.--Bail granted.

Malik Manzoor Ahmad Bharah for Petitioner.

Nazir Ahmad Bhatti for the State.

Date of hearing: 16th July, 1985.

JUDGMENT

This is an application for bail an behalf of Mst. Razia Bibi in case under section 16/10(2) of Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Bahawalpur vide F.I.R. No. 1 of 1985.

2. The prosecution case as per F.I. R. was that Safdar Shah and others abducted Mst. Razia Bibi petitioner in order to subject her to illicit intercourse. During the investigation it was found that she had been committing Zina with Safdar Shah of her own accord.

3. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner being a woman her case falls within the proviso to section 497, Cr.P.C. The learned counsel for the State does not controvert this submission.

4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counse for the parties with care. I find that according to the F.I.R. Mst. Razia Bibi was not a consenting party to her abduction; that there is no direct evidence of commission of Zina by her with Safdar Shah an that she being a woman her case falls within proviso to section 497, Cr.P.C. Without making any observation, I feel inclined to allow her bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate, Bahawalpur.

H.A.K.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Gilgit lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.