Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AJMAL KHAN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 426 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Bail, Under the Applicants' Grant Section 302, PPC Petitioner's case to be sentenced Did not hear within 2 years. Section 6 426 of section (42), clause (c) of the CCPC (aa) and likewise it earned the right to bail under the circumstances, then the applicant's sentence was suspended and he allowed bail. ?

1985 M L D 789(2)

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J

MUHAMMAD AJMAL KHAN--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3 of 1983 in Criminal Appeal No705 of 1981, decided on 20th December, 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 426--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302--Bail, grant of--Petitioners appeAl not heard within a period of 2 years of his conviction under S. 302, P. P.C--Petitioner's case, held, covered by clause (c) of subsection (1-A) of S. 426, Cr.P.C. and as such he earned right of bail in circumstances--Petitioner's sentence suspended and he allowed bail.

Zahid Hussain Khan and Rabnawaz Khan Niazi for the Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

ORDER

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3 of 1983

The petitioner has been sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 10,000 vide judgment, dated 24th November, 1981. This is a second petition for the suspension of sentence, the first one having been rejected on 23rd June, 1982. The fresh ground urged for bail is that the appeal of the petitioner having not been heard within a period of two years of his conviction, he has earned the right of bail. The case falls under clause (c) of subsection (1-A) of section 426, Cr.P.C. Consequently, the sentence of the petitioner is suspended A subject to his furnishing security in the sum of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Mianwali.

S.G.D.

Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Amangarh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.