Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM NABI versus STATE


The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 307/452/34 and 324 sentencing amendments only admit regular hearings on the question of punishment and its accomplices prosecuted under section 307/452/34, the PPC co-accused of the trial court. Eviction by nature and the nature of dismissal of offenders convicted under Section 324, PPC appeal, guaranteed reduction of sentence

1985 M L D 778

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

GHULAM NABI--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Revision No. 686 of 1984, heard on 12th December, 1984

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--

---Ss. 307/452/34&324--Sentence--Revision admitted to regular hearing on question of sentence only--Accused and his co-accused tried under S. 307/452/34, P.P.C--Co-accused acquitted by trial Court and accused convicted under S. 324, P.P.C--Appeal of accused dismissed--Nature of injuries warranting reduction of sentence--Sentence reduced from six months, R.I. to three months, R.I. in circumstances.

Ch. Muhammad Abdul Wahid for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing: 12th December, 1984.

JUDGEMENT

The facts giving rise to this revision are that Ghulam Nabi petitioner was tried by Magistrate Section 30, Faisalabad under section 307/452/34, P.P.C. The allegations were that the petitioner and others after having made preparation to cause hurt launched murderous assault on Mst. Shamim Akhtar and Mst. Rashidan P.Ws. On the conclusion of the trial, while acquitting the co-accused the learned Magistrate convicted Ghulam Nabi petitioner under section 324, P.P.C. and sentenced him to six months R.I. and a fine of Rs. 500 in default thereof two months R.I. His appeal failed on 13-11-1984, hence this revision.

2. On 11-12-1984, I admitted the petition to regular hearing on the question of sentence only. No one has appeared for the State to oppose this revision.

3. In view of the circumstances of the case and the nature of injuries caused by the petitioner, I feel inclined to reduce the sentence of six months, R.I. to three months, R.I. The fine of Rs. 500 and imprisonment in default thereof is maintained. With this reduction in the sentence, the revision is disposed of.

S.A

Sentence altered

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from South Wazirstan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.