Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SAJIDA DURRANI versus STATE


During the investigation of the accused, the accused was found not fired at any time during the investigation of the accused. The PC suspect granted bail in the circumstances

1985 M L D 764 (1)

[Lahore]

Before Gulbaz Khan, J

Mst. SAJIDA DURRANI--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2700-B of 1984, decided on 20th October, 1984.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---

---S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.148/302/149--Bail, grant of- Accused found innocent during investigation--Accused had not fired any shot at deceased--Case of accused falling under first proviso to S.497, Cr.P.C.--Accused granted bail in circumstances.

Sardar Muhammad Akram for the Petitioner.

M. Saleem Shad for the State.

ORDER

Mst. Sajida Durrani had previously filed petition for bail before arrest which was dismissed by this Court vide order, dated 28-8-1984. The second petition for bail after arrest has been moved on the ground that the petitioner was found innocent during the investigation of the case and her case was also covered under first proviso to section 497, Cr.P.C. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had not fired any shot at the deceased.

2. I have gone through the case diary and perused Zimni, dated 1-9-1984 recorded by D.S.P. Mughalpura. He came to the conclusion that Mst. Sapda Durrani was innocent and was-being involved at. the instance of her political rival Mian Ilyas. He gave direction that she be got discharged. An application was moved before the Magistrate who did not accede to the request of the police. Another application was moved in the Court of Session for the discharge of Mst.Sajida Durrani but that too was rejected.

3. In view of the fact that the petitioner was found innocent during) the investigation of the case and had not fired any shot at the deceased and her case was also covered under first proviso to section 497,' Cr. P. C . , I admit her to bail in the sum of Rupees two lac with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge.

S.A.

Bail granted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Karachi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.