Section 13 Students, Requirements Performance History Not to mention the date of the demand by notice of the student's statement in the statement of testimony before the witness, high proof of autonomy, student performance and probate performance, and then student evidence The successful use of the right to sovereignty in its own historical setting required that any reduction of such legal requirements would offer accountability for dismissal of the plaintiff, in the present case, the plaintiff mentioned in the notice. The date of the demand was not mentioned through the notice of E-Assad. Demand through notice of date, time and place were required, as well as the requisite requirements and leaving such details would be fatal to a pre-discrimination case The plaintiff was obliged to present a postman whose service / The notice of the student was not presented to prove the delivery but neither the author nor the postman was presented. The plaintiff's witnesses contradicted each other. in relation to the date of sending and not a true and reliable witness. In the present case, the students can not be aysad notice performance, pre amptr, conditions, had failed to comply with the mandatory provisions. The following two courts correctly dismissed the case, correctly admiring the evidence available on the record; any weakness, misrepresentation or non-readability of any of the unwarranted decisions passed by the courts below. Was not found.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
