Section 342, 364 (2), and 537 Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13, the accused was examined in his presence for certifying the unauthorized magistrate or judge and hearing on the review request. The statements of the accused were filed under section 342, the CRPC was not affirmed by the trial court under the meaning of section (2) of section 364, the CCPC, which is required by law in the natural law on this subject. Was, according to the trial court, not processed. The mandatory supply of Section 646464, CRPC, when recording the statements of the accused under Section 2342, CRPC, is illegal, which cannot be recovered under the meaning of Section 3737, CRPC and Section 2342. Such unverified statements of the accused, CCP, will have no identifiable value. And non-compliance with the provisions of section 646464, CRPC, made the entire trial unsuccessful and, along with the trial, the judgment of the accused approved by the Court of Appeal below, Was not sustainable, and was. The case was referred to the trial court with a direction to record the statements of the accused under Section 342, CR PC, as per law. And then quickly settle the case
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
