Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

PUNJAB URBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND ANOTHER


Temporary Constitutional Order 1981 Article 9 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Sections 25A & 38 (3) Writing of jurisdiction in labor matters Transport Corporation employees did not meet the rules and did not pass the Intermediate Examination Refused to develop due to. The Labor Court upheld the appeal by the Labor Appeal Tribunal's order against the Labor Appeal Tribunal's refusal to accept the employee's complaints requests and the issue was recently refreshed by the High Court's consensus. It is agreed to seek remand for the most recent decision. Written according to circumstances, accepted the Labor Appellate Tribunal's remand for fresh decision in accordance with law

1985 P L C 952

[Lahore High Court]

Before Fazal-i-Mahmood and Muhammad Zafrullah, JJ

PUNJAB URBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION

Versus

PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND ANOTHER

Writ Petitions Nos. 255 and 3443 of 1981, decided on 13th May, 1985.

Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981)-

-- Art. 9-Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Ss. 25-A & 38(3)-Writ jurisdiction-Invoking of in labour cases-Employees of Transport Corporation denied promotion on grounds of not fulfilling requirements of rules and not having passed Inter mediate Examination - Labour Court accepting grievance peti tions of employees against non-promotion and order of Labour Court confirmed in appeal by Labour Appellate Tribunal-Order of Labour Appellate Tribunal challenged by way of writ petition --Parties before High Court agreeing that case be remanded for fresh decision after giving reasons for judgment - Writ Petitions in circumstances, accepted remanding case to Labour Appellate Tribunal for fresh decision in accordance with law.

A. Q. M. Shafiqul Islam for Petitioner.

Khalid Ahmad for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 13th May, 1985.

JUDGMENT

MUHAMMAD ZAFARULLAH J.

-This judgment will dispose of the following writ petitions as common questions of law and facts are involved :-

(1) W. P. No. 255/81.

(2) W. P. No. 3443/81.

2. The employees in the two writ petitions were denied promotion by the Punjab Urban Transport Corporation on the ground that they did not fulfil the requirements of 1976 Rules nor having passed the Intermediate Examination. The Labour Court accepted the grievance petitions. The orders were confirmed in appeal by the Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal. This has brought the Punjab Urban Transport Corporation to the High Court invoking its constitutional jurisdiction.

2. The order passed by the Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal has been read in Court and the learned counsel for both the sides agree that the case be remanded for fresh decision after giving reasons for its judgment. The writ petitions are, therefore, allowed. The matter is remanded to the Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal for fresh decision in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.

A. E.

Petitions allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Warburton lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.