Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

INAYAT ULLAH versus THE STATE


8 The applicant for review is negligent in supplying the colony of Malawi, therefore, there is no matter of the provision for review which cannot be investigated with proper diligence.

P L D 1959 W. P. (Rev.) 138

Before M. Z. Khan, Member Board of Revenue, West Pakistan

INAYAT ULLAH‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE and another‑Respondents

Review Side No. 47 of 1957‑58, decided on 12th May 1958, District Bahawalpur.

West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act (XI of 1957),

S. Review‑Petitioner being ignorant of a provision of Colony Malawi not a ground for Review‑Provision not a matter which could nor have been discovered with due diligence.

Ghulam Ali Alvi for Petitioner.

ORDER

This is a petition under section 8 of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act, 1957, for the review of order dated the 12th October 1957, passed by my learned predecessor by which he rejected the petition of Inyatullah.

The facts of the case are mentioned in my predecessor's order and need not be repeated here. It has been urged that the provisions of paragraph 617 of the Colony Manual were not known to the petitioner at the time he filed the previous petitioner and the matter mentioned in that paragraph could not be raised by him. This is not a point which he could not have bound by due diligence and is not covered by section 8 of the West Pakistan, Board of Revenue Act, 1957.

The only other point urged at the time of arguments was that the order of my predecessor would debar the Commissioner from creating an additional Lambardari for all time to come. That is not so. The Commissioner has passed the order on material available before him. If the circumstances change and justify the addition of a Lambardari. It will be open to the Commissioner to pass fresh orders.

The petition is rejected without issuing notice to the other party.

A. H. Petition rejected.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Adda Shaiwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.